Freedom Of Speech Is a Two Edged Sword

Mike’s Common Sense

All of this talk of censoring free speech has got me thinking.

Basically it all started with this favorite radio/podcast host I have. This gentleman and his wife were driving up in Maine when a pickup truck drove past them with Confederate flags flying from the rear of their truck. This host, and his wife were offended by the flying of the Confederate flags, and pulled into a store parking lot to confront the folks in the truck. The radio/podcast host and his wife told the couple in the truck that they were offended by their flying of the Confederate flag which they saw as being racist in nature. They were summarily flipped off by the couple in the truck, and a short verbal confrontation occurred, fortunately no was hurt or worse.

As I listened to this tale, I was thinking to myself “Well the Confederate flag is a symbol, and symbols mean different things to different people. Their anger may be justified, but maybe my radio host and his wife were a little out of line.”

But then I thought some more, “What if they were flying a Nazi flag instead of a Confederate flag from the back of their pickup truck?” This flag has definite racial meanings to it. Should I, or anyone else confront them to say that they are offended? Should there be a LAW that states that the Nazi flag not be flown by anyone in public?

This censorship of offensive material is a very slippery slope. The First Amendment to the Constitution states that no laws shall be passed to restrict the right of free speech of American citizens. Citizens also have a right to disagree with what others say. There is a right to express yourself, whether it be a Nazi Flag, Confederate Flag, or whether you have a Christmas tree. The Constitution does not give you the right to bash, pummel, or kill anyone who you disagree with, or who you feel offended by.

If you give the government, or anyone the power to censor Nazi Flags, Confederate Flags, statues of Robert E. Lee, etc. you are opening a Pandora’s box. This is opening a door to anything, and everything being censored that someone, (or the government, who the Constitution is really protecting us from) finds offensive.

We all need to grow a thicker skin. Dumb asses fly Confederate flags in Maine, or wear Nazi gear for one reason; to piss people off. These dumb asses get off on doing that. Don’t play into their game and add more anger which they feed off of. The best way to handle dumb asses is simply to ignore them

Allow dumb asses to be dumb asses as long as they are not violent dumb asses. The Constitution allows everyone who wants to be a dumb ass to be one.

2 thoughts on “Freedom Of Speech Is a Two Edged Sword”

  1. “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” ― George Orwell

    “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ― George Washington

    The first ten amendments to the constitution became the Bill of Rights, of which Amendment 1 reads:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
    .
    The left has attacked freedom of the press through government action and through corporate action. The press has by and large become a propaganda organ of the left. In part this happened during the Obama administration with the passing of NDAA of 2013, and more damage was inflicted in 2016, as Zero Hedge reported:

    In the true Orwellian fashion now typifying 2016, a bill to implement the U.S.’ very own de facto Ministry of Truth has been quietly introduced in Congress – its lack of fanfare appropriate given the bill’s equally subtle language. As with any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight, however, the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate information.

    Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a “whole-government approach without the bureaucratic restrictions” to counter “foreign disinformation and manipulation,” which they believe threaten the world’s “security and stability.”

    The left (including rino’s) has attacked freedom of the press and free speech during the Obama years and now we are reaping the whirlwind as social media platforms determine what is free speech and what is hate speech.

    There aren’t democrats and republicans, there are nationalists and globalist.

    I am an American.

    Also check this link: https://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6

Leave a Reply